FredWalk
2013-01-06 18:56:54
If not possible in the tool as it seems, What I'd find most useful would be to have available for our mappings variables organized in tables.
and that we could address one particular entry in the variable matrix by using the predefined variables in the tool.
Example,
say I'm receiving 90 qq pp and that under certain conditions ( not listed here ) I wish to store into ga(qq) the value pp ( or anything else btw ).
In addition, building conditionals is really a convenient but poor function as implemented here : Combined would help also ( like if pp>80 and pp<90 ) making 'scripting' easy.
Finally, loops like FOR...NEXT could be one feature. I appreciate all implications for users ( deadloops, slowering down when too many cycles ) but I also believe this is part of user's responsibility to build accordingly, it should not be a software restriction.
Cheers,
and that we could address one particular entry in the variable matrix by using the predefined variables in the tool.
Example,
say I'm receiving 90 qq pp and that under certain conditions ( not listed here ) I wish to store into ga(qq) the value pp ( or anything else btw ).
In addition, building conditionals is really a convenient but poor function as implemented here : Combined would help also ( like if pp>80 and pp<90 ) making 'scripting' easy.
Finally, loops like FOR...NEXT could be one feature. I appreciate all implications for users ( deadloops, slowering down when too many cycles ) but I also believe this is part of user's responsibility to build accordingly, it should not be a software restriction.
Cheers,